Posts by Owner

NEW MEXICO COURT OF APPEALS

LINE #19, IN FAVOR OF APPELLEE, BRENDA PRICE, NOTE 3 DATES   MANDATE TO THE DISTRICT COURT CLERK  

Read More

REVENUE STREAM SANS MORTGAGES

Revenue Equity Sans Mortgages

Read More

FOLLOW THE MONEY CHART

14 FLIPPED MORTGAGED

Read More

BANK OF AMERICA PURCHASE COUNTRYWIDE 2008

CHAIN OF CUSTODY IS IN QUESTION ON THIS NOTE. COURT TESTIMONY IS FRAUDULENT; COUNTRYWIDE DID NOT EXIST IN 2013 WHEN BOA ASSIGNED THE MORTGAGE TO US BANK, AND THERE IS NO EVIDENCE LINKING TO A 2003 OWNERSHIP TO US BANK. THE INDORSEMENTS ARE OUT OF SEQUENCE. THE NOTE FILED BY PLAINTIFF WAS NOT FILED WITH THE COMPLAINT FOR FORECLOSURE IN 2013, BUT WAS FILED 8 DAYS LATER; THE INDORSEMENTS ARE OUT OF SEQUENCE. COUNTRYWIDE DID NOT EXIST IN 2013, AND BANK OF AMERICA WAS OWNER OF THE NOTE HAVING PURCHASED COUNTRYWIDE IN 2008.   NOTE INDORSEMENT FILED BY US BANK IN 2013_Scan_20231126...

Read More

2023 CANCELLATIONS

JUST SOME OF OUR CANCELLATIONS WRSA CANCELLATIONS_2023-08-11  

Read More

FEDERAL COURT STIPULATED ORDER

     

Read More

LENDER LIABILITY SPREADSHEET

BP_Lender_Liability_Time Line_Spreadsheet_Update_(2)

Read More

2004 SURVEY PLAT OF 110B DONE AFTER CLOSING

110B SURVEY PLAT JUNE 2004 This Survey Plat was completed in June of 2004, after the signed May 17, 2004 closing back-dated to MAY 14, 2004, negating my 3-day right of rescission, adding $20,000 to principle with no net benefit to me, paying Broker $20,000 in spite of lack of specific performance, and this survey ordered by S&S Financial correctly shows the boundaries of 110B Mabel Dodge Lane.

Read More

BROKER’S PRICE OPINION 2007

 

Read More

TIMELINE OF 110B MABEL DODGE LANE

January 21, 2004, Chase Manhattan Mortgage, who is not a legal party of interest, faxes to S&S financial a blank Statement of Borrower’s Benefits.   January 23, 2004, the same Statement of Borrower’s Benefits is faxed to Ms. Price to sign and date the document as February 3, 2004 and fax it back to S&S Financial.   February 2, 2004, S&S Financial loans to National City Mortgage the amount of $126,000.   February 3, 2004 , Closing occurs in Taos between National City Mortgage and Ms. Price for a high interest First Mortgage in the amount of $630,000 and a high interest...

Read More

TIMELINE OF 110A MABEL DODGE LANE

110A TIMELINE D-820-CV-2013-00405   1-2-02             HUD COUNTRYWIDE, AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER, #3954619 $620K PAYS OFF                   $491K TO HOMECOMINGS, AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER, AND ADDS $172K TO                   110A, PAYS PEOPLE’S BANK 157K, SUNDANCE MORT. GETS $6,200; BP PAYS $20,976.   2-11-02           HUD  BANK OF AMERICA, #6241388844 ADDS the SAME $172K TO 110B (BOTH ARE                 CALLED 110B, BUT SURVEY IS NOT 110B, IT IS 110C OR PART OF 110A) PEOPLE’S                  BANK IS PAID OUTSIDE OF CLOSING BY 100K CD OWNED BY BP FOR...

Read More

CHAT TRANSCRIPT TO RECOVER WEBSITES

HostMonster Sun, Oct 29, 12:33 PM to me   Dear brenda, This email is regarding the chat you had with the Hostmonster support team. Here is the chat transcript: Start Time: Oct. 29, 2023, 5:32 p.m. End Time: None Oct. 29, 2023, 5:32 p.m. None Thank you for contacting *HostMonster*. By continuing you agree to our privacy policy https://newfold.com/privacy-center Oct. 29, 2023, 5:32 p.m. None What is the product you need help with? Oct. 29, 2023, 5:32 p.m. customer brenprice.com cannot be reached Oct. 29, 2023, 5:32 p.m. None Sorry. To best assist you, please select one of the available...

Read More

DISCUSSIONS OF JUDICIAL BIAS AND RELEVANT ELEMENTS

JUDICIAL BIAS EXAMINE THE DOCKET AUGUST 10, 2022 HEARING ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER, JUDGE SHANNON RULES AGAINST ME FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR, BUT I DID APPEAR, I DROVE ALL THE WAY TO ALBUQUERQUE TO APPEAR IN HIS FAMOUS ZOOM HEARING, BUT WE WERE NOT ALLOWED IN – COULD HEAR DISCUSSIONS, THEN FINALLY CLERK COMES ON AND SAYS, “MR PADILLA, YOU ARE DISMISSED.” NO EXPLANATION. October 30, 2018, PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO APPEAR AT MY HEARING WITH NO CONSEQUENCES; I SHOULD HAVE WON AT THAT JUNCTURE. I HAD ALREADY WON AT APPEALS COURT, BUT DISTRICT COURT IS IN CONTEMPT OF HIGHER COURT ORDERS. I...

Read More